Premium
Use of intravenous immunoglobulin for treatment of recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review
Author(s) -
Hutton B,
Sharma R,
Fergusson D,
Tinmouth A,
Hebert P,
Jamieson J,
Walker M
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01201.x
Subject(s) - miscarriage , antibody , medicine , recurrent miscarriage , intravenous immunoglobulins , pregnancy , intensive care medicine , immunology , biology , genetics
Background Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is a fractionated blood product whose off‐label use for treating a variety of conditions, including spontaneous recurrent miscarriage, has continued to grow in recent years. Its high costs and short supply necessitate improved guidance on its appropriate applications. Objective We conducted a systematic review of randomised controlled trials evaluating IVIG for treatment of spontaneous recurrent miscarriage. Search strategy A systematic search strategy was applied to Medline (1966 to June 2005) and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (June 2005). Selection criteria We included all randomised controlled trials comparing all dosages of IVIG to placebo or an active control. Data collection and analysis Two investigators independently extracted data using a standardised data collection form. Measures of effect were derived for each trial independently, and studies were pooled based on clinical and methodologic appropriateness. Main results We identified eight trials involving 442 women that evaluated IVIG therapy used to treat recurrent miscarriage. Overall, IVIG did not significantly increase the odds ratio (OR) of live birth when compared with placebo for treatment of recurrent miscarriage (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.78–2.10). There was, however, a significant increase in live births following IVIG use in women with secondary recurrent miscarriage (OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.09–6.73), while those with primary miscarriage did not experience the same benefit (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.35–1.26). Author’s conclusions IVIG increased the rates of live birth in secondary recurrent miscarriage, but there was insufficient evidence for its use in primary recurrent miscarriage.