Premium
Factors influencing repeat caesarean section: qualitative exploratory study of obstetricians' and midwives' accounts
Author(s) -
Kamal Pallavi,
DixonWoods Mary,
Kurinczuk Jennifer J.,
Oppenheimer Christina,
Squire Patricia,
Waugh Jason
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00647.x
Subject(s) - caesarean section , nursing , qualitative research , exploratory research , psychology , medicine , health professionals , health care , medical education , family medicine , obstetrics , pregnancy , sociology , social science , genetics , anthropology , biology , economics , economic growth
Objective To explore the views of health professionals on the factors influencing repeat caesarean section. Design Qualitative study involving semi‐structured interviews with professionals who care for women in pregnancy and labour. Setting Acute hospital trust with two maternity units and community midwifery service, Leicestershire, UK. Sample Twenty‐five midwives and doctors. Methods Interviews with professionals were undertaken using a prompt guide. All interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Analysis was based on the constant comparative method, assisted by QSR N5 software. Main outcome measures Identification of factors influencing professional decision making about repeat caesarean section. Results Decision making in relation to repeat caesarean is a complex process involving several parties. Professionals identify the relevance of evidence for decision making for repeat caesarean. However, professionals feel that following strict protocols is of limited value because of the perceived substandard quality of evidence in this area, other external pressures and the contingent, unique and often unanticipated features of each case. Professionals also perceive that the organisation of care plays an important role in rates of repeat caesarean. Conclusions Decision making for repeat caesarean is a social practice where standardised protocols may have limited value. Attention needs to be given to the multiple parties involved in the decision‐making process. Reflective practice, opinion leadership and role modelling may offer ways forward but will require evaluation.