Premium
Breastfeeding expectations versus reality: a clusterrandomised controlled trial
Author(s) -
Lavender Tina,
Baker Lisa,
Smyth Rebecca,
Collins Stuart,
Spofforth Anne,
Dey Paola
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00644.x
Subject(s) - breastfeeding , medicine , cluster randomised controlled trial , cluster (spacecraft) , randomized controlled trial , affect (linguistics) , breast milk , breast feeding , demography , pregnancy , pediatrics , obstetrics , intervention (counseling) , nursing , psychology , surgery , communication , sociology , biology , computer science , genetics , programming language , biochemistry , chemistry
Objective To evaluate the affect of an antenatal educational breastfeeding intervention on women's breastfeeding duration. Design Cluster randomised controlled trial. Unit of randomisation: electoral ward. The primary outcome was the proportion that fulfilled their antenatal breastfeeding expectation. Secondary outcomes were the number of women breastfeeding on discharge and at four months. Data were collected using a series of questionnaires and diaries. Setting Teaching hospital in North West of England. Participants Women who expressed a desire to breastfeed at the start of their pregnancy. Methods Women were allocated to either routine antenatal education or an additional single educational group session supervised by a lactation specialist and attended by midwives from their locality. Main outcome measure The proportion of women who fulfilled their expectation of breastfeeding. Result One thousand three hundred and twelve women were randomised, with 1249 (95%) women available for analysis. There was no difference between the groups in the proportion of women who attained their expected duration of breastfeeding (OR 1.2; 95% CI 0.89–1.6; χ 2 = 1.4, df = 1, P = 0.2; mean cluster size 156, design effect 1.6). There were no differences between the groups in the uptake of breastfeeding on discharge (OR = 1.2; 95% CI 0.8–1.7; χ 2 = 1.1, df = 1, P = 0.3; mean cluster size 163, design effect = 2.0) or exclusively at four months (OR = 1.1; 95% CI 0.6–1.8; χ 2 = 0.07, df = 1, P = 0.8; mean cluster size 156, design effect 1.6). Conclusion The provision of a single educational group session supervised by a lactation specialist, and attended by midwives and women, failed to promote the uptake of breastfeeding. Public health interventions, which encourage positive attitudes to breastfeeding within the family and wider community, should be developed and evaluated.