Premium
Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score
Author(s) -
Rozenberg Patrick,
Chevret Sylvie,
Chastang Claude,
Ville Yves
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00549.x
Subject(s) - medicine , bishop score , confidence interval , hazard ratio , cervix , cohort , obstetrics , labor induction , population , vaginal delivery , gestation , gynecology , pregnancy , environmental health , cancer , oxytocin , biology , genetics
Objective To compare pre‐induction ultrasonographic cervical length and Bishop score in predicting time to delivery after labour induction with prostaglandins. Design Prognostic cohort study. Setting Tertiary referral maternity unit in a teaching hospital. Population Two hundred and sixty‐six women with singleton pregnancies at between 34 +0 and 41 +3 weeks of gestation requiring induction of labour with prostaglandins for medical indications. Methods A secondary analysis of a trial comparing two prostaglandins. Assessment of the Bishop score and measurement of the cervical length by transvaginal sonography were performed by two operators, blinded to each other's results. We estimated the predictive effects on the outcomes of ultrasonographic cervical length and Bishop score. Main outcome measure Time intervals from induction to delivery and to vaginal delivery. Results Cervical length and Bishop score were associated with the time interval from induction to delivery, based on univariable analyses. When considered jointly in a multivariable model, only the Bishop score was significantly related to the outcome: The higher the Bishop score, the higher the hazard to delivery [hazard ratio (HR): 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1–1.3], illustrating that once the Bishop score is taken into account, further knowledge of cervical ultrasound length (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98–1.0) did not add any predictive information. Also, Bishop score was predictive of time interval between induction and vaginal delivery (HR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1–1.4) while cervical length had no additional predictive value (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98–1.0) when both cervical length and Bishop score were introduced in the model. Conclusions The Bishop score appears to be a better predictor of the time interval from induction to delivery and to vaginal delivery than cervical length after induction of labour for medical reasons.