Premium
The effectiveness of GnRHa with and without ‘add‐back’ therapy in treating premenstrual syndrome: a meta analysis
Author(s) -
Wyatt Katrina M.,
Dimmock Paul W.,
Ismail Khaled M.K.,
Jones Peter W.,
O'Brien P.M. Shaughn
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00135.x
Subject(s) - medicine , placebo , confidence interval , odds ratio , meta analysis , randomized controlled trial , population , physical therapy , alternative medicine , environmental health , pathology
Objective To determine the effectiveness of gonadotrophin‐releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa) with and without hormonal add‐back therapy in the management of premenstrual syndrome. Design Randomised controlled trials were identified by searching multiple databases. Setting Exeter and North Devon Research and Development Support Unit and Keele University Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Population Women with pre‐diagnosed premenstrual syndrome and/or premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Methods A meta‐analysis of published randomised placebo‐controlled trials assessing the use of GnRHa in the management of premenstrual syndrome. The standardised mean difference for each individual study and subsequently an overall standardised mean difference were calculated after demonstrating the consistency or homogeneity of the study results. Main outcome measures Overall improvement in premenstrual symptomatology and effectiveness of GnRHa with additional hormonal add‐back therapy were the main outcome measures assessed in this analysis. A secondary analysis was performed to assess the effectiveness of GnRHa in treating physical and emotional symptoms. Results Overall standardised mean difference for all trials that assessed the efficacy of GnRHa was −1.19 (95% confidence interval [CI] −1.88 to −0.51). The equivalent odds ratio was 8.66 (95% CI 2.52 to 30.26) in favour of GnRHa. GnRHa were more efficacious for physical than behavioural symptoms, although the difference was not statistically significant. The addition of hormonal add‐back therapy to GnRHa did not appear to reduce the efficacy of GnRHa alone; standardised mean difference 0.12 (95% CI −0.35 to 0.58). Conclusions GnRHa appear to be an effective treatment in the management of premenstrual syndrome. The addition of hormonal add‐back therapy to reduce side effects does not reduce efficacy.