Premium
Does a discrepancy between gestational age determined by biparietal diameter and last menstrual period sometimes signify early intrauterine growth retardation?
Author(s) -
Larsen T.,
Nguyen T. H.,
Greisen G.,
Engholm G.,
Møller H.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11695.x
Subject(s) - obstetrics , medicine , gestation , gestational age , pregnancy , population , biparietal diameter , birth weight , gynecology , biology , genetics , head circumference , environmental health
Objective To assess the association between gestational age estimated from the last menstrual period (GA LMP ) or from the biparietal diameter (GA BPD ), and the subsequent birthweight for gestational age. Design Population‐based follow up study. Setting Of 21,936 pregnancies contained in the ultrasound database, 16,387 singleton pregnancies with a reliable last menstrual period date and an ultrasound examination between 12 and 22 weeks of gestation were included. Main outcome measures Correlation between: 1. birthweight deviation (birthweight‐expected weight for gestation); 2. birthweight; and 3. pregnancy length and (GA LMP ‐GA BPD ). Relative risk of birthweight < 2500 g and low birthweight for gestation (> 22% below normal weight) related to five levels of discrepancy between (GA LMP ‐GA BPD ). Results (GA LMP ‐GA BPD ) was not associated with deviation of birthweight related to GA BPD However the risk of low birthweight (< 2500 g) and low birthweight for gestational age was significantly increased when (GA LMP ‐GA BPD ) was > 7 days. Conclusion A biparietal diameter smaller than expected from the last menstrual period date is mainly a problem of an error related to estimated time of ovulation. At the same time the relative risk of a low birthweight infant is slightly increased.