Premium
Intrapartum umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome: a systematic review
Author(s) -
Farrell Tom,
Chien Patrick F. W.,
Gordon Adam
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08398.x
Subject(s) - umbilical artery , medicine , apgar score , caesarean section , fetal distress , obstetrics , cardiotocography , gestational age , meta analysis , cochrane library , fetus , pregnancy , genetics , biology
Objective To evaluate the diagnostic prediction of intrapartum umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry for adverse perinatal outcomes using systematic quantitative overview of the available literature. Design Online searching of MEDLINE database (January 1966–September 1997), scanning of bibliography of known primary and review articles, review of recent journal issues and that from personal files. Study selection, assessment of study quality and data extraction were all performed in duplicate under masked conditions. Participants 2700 women (unselected, low, high, and combined low and high obstetric risk populations) included in eight studies selected for meta‐analyses. Main outcome measures Likelihood ratios (LRs) for positive and negative test results were generated for the following outcome measures: Apgar scores < 7 at 1 and 5 minute following delivery, small for gestational age fetus; intrapartum fetal heart rate abnormality, umbilical arterial acidosis at delivery; and caesarean section for fetal distress. Results For Apgar score < 7 at 1 minute following delivery, the pooled LR was 2.5 (95% CI1.7–3.7) for a positive test and 1.0 (95% CI 0.9–1.1) for a negative test result. A positive test predicted an Apgar score < 7 at 5 minute following delivery with a pooled LR of 1.3 (95% CI 0.4–4.1) while a negative test had a pooled LR of 1 0 (95% CI 0.8–1.2). For the prediction of a small for gestational age fetus, the pooled LR was 3.4 (95% CI 2.3–5.1) for a positive test and 0.9 (95% CI 0.8–1.0) for a negative test. The prediction for fetal heart rate abnormality during labour was similarly disappointing: the pooled LR for a positive test result was 1.4 (95% CI 0.9–1.2) whereas a negative test result generated a pooled LR of 0.9 (95% CI 0.9–1 e0). With umbilical acidosis at delivery, the pooled LR was 1.6 (95% CI 1.1–2.5) for a positive test and 1.1 (95% CI 1.0–1.2) for a negative test. The LRs for the prediction of caesarean section for fetal distress were 4.1 (95% CI 2.7–6.2) for a positive test result and 0.9 (95% CI 0.8–1.0) for a negative test result. Conclusion Intrapartum umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry is a poor predictor of adverse perinatal outcomes.