Premium
Introducing external cephalic version at 36 weeks or more in a district general hospital: a review and an audit
Author(s) -
Healey Martin,
Porter Richard,
Galimberti Andrea
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12070.x
Subject(s) - external cephalic version , breech presentation , cephalic presentation , medicine , caesarean section , vaginal delivery , obstetrics , population , pregnancy , environmental health , genetics , biology
Objective To audit the effect of introducing external cephalic version at 36 weeks on breech delivery rates and modes, and to assess factors that affect external cephalic version success rates. Design A prospective unblinded study over 12 months of factors affecting external cephalic version success. A retrospective review of breech deliveries for 12 months before introducing external cephalic version and the first 12 months of practising external cephalic versions. Setting Royal United Hospital, Bath. Population One hundred and three women ( 36 weeks) with breech presentation booked for external cephalic version, and 324 women with a singleton breech presentation at delivery between November 1992 and October 1994. Methods External cephalic version attempted on 89 women. Tocolysis was used on 41 of these women. Main outcome measures External cephalic version success rate. Breech presentation rates (suitable for external cephalic version) at delivery. Delivery mode rates for breeches. Results External cephalic version was successful in 39% of women. The breech presentation rate (external cephalic version suitable) at delivery fell from 2.7% to 2.4% of all deliveries. The vaginal breech delivery rate fell from 0.98% to 0.51%. The caesarean section rate was 63% for breeches (external cephalic version suitable) before external cephalic version introduction, and 47% among women who had an attempted external cephalic version. Conclusions Attempted external cephalic version reduces the woman's risk of vaginal breech delivery and caesarean section. It provides individual women with a third management option and the possibility of avoiding a vaginal breech delivery or a caesarean section. To avoid one caesarean section takes 5.9 attempted external cephalic versions. This approach is expensive in operator time. Operator, placental site, position of fetal back and amniotic fluid index had a significant effect on the success of external cephalic version.