Premium
A randomised double blind placebo controlled trial of fish oil in high risk pregnancy
Author(s) -
Onwude J. L.,
Lilford R. J.,
Hjartardottir H.,
Staines A.,
Tuffnell D.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb09059.x
Subject(s) - pregnancy , medicine , placebo , relative risk , eicosapentaenoic acid , docosahexaenoic acid , fish oil , obstetrics , adverse effect , randomized controlled trial , confidence interval , fatty acid , polyunsaturated fatty acid , fish <actinopterygii> , genetics , alternative medicine , chemistry , organic chemistry , pathology , fishery , biology
Objective To determine whether n‐3 fatty acid (EPA/DCHA) prophylaxis is beneficial in high risk pregnancies. Design A randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial. Setting Antenatal clinic of St James's University Hospital, Leeds. Subjects Two hundred and thirty‐three pregnant women at high risk of developing proteinuric or nonproteinuric pregnancy induced hypertension or asymmetrical intrauterine growth retardation. Intervention Active treatment was 2.7 g of MaxEpa daily (1.62 g of eicosapentaenoic acid and 1.08 g of docosahexaenoic acid). Placebo were matching air‐filled capsules. Main outcome measures Occurrence of proteinuric, nonproteinuric pregnancy induced hypertension or birthweight < 3rd centile. Results There was no difference in an intention to treat analysis between the placebo and active treatment groups for occurrence of proteinuric pregnancy induced hypertension (relative risk (RR) = 0.88;95% CI 0.47–1.66), nonproteinuric pregnancy induced hypertension (RR = 0.89; 95% CI0.48–1.64), birthweight < 3rd centile (RR = 0.89; 95% CI 0.48–1.64), or the duration of pregnancy (difference of mean durations = 0.1 days; 95% CI ‐4.8 to 4.9 days). Analyses stratified by use of tobacco, and analyses excluding known major protocol violators gave essentially identical results. Conclusion There is no evidence from ths study for any useful effect of fish oil supplementation for women at high risk of adverse outcomes from a pregnancy, but a small protective effect remains a possibility.