Premium
Umbilical cord blood gas analysis at delivery: a time for quality data
Author(s) -
Westgate Jennifer,
Garibaldi Jonathan M.,
Greene Keith R.
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13581.x
Subject(s) - cord , medicine , umbilical cord , acidosis , vein , cord blood , anesthesia , artery , venous blood , arterial blood , cardiology , surgery , anatomy
Objectives To address the practical problems of routine umbilical cord blood sampling, to determine the ranges for pH, pCO 2 and base deficit and to examine the relationships of these parameters between cord vessels. Design An observational study of umbilical cord artery and vein blood gas results. Setting A large district general hospital in the UK. Subject One thousand nine hundred and forty‐two cord results from 2013 consecutive pregnancies of 34 weeks or more gestation, monitored by fetal scalp electrode during labour. Results Only 1448 (74.6%) of the 1942 supposedly paired samples had validated pH and pCO 2 data both from an artery and the vein; 54 (2.8%) had only one blood sample available, 90 (4.6%) had an error in the pH or pCO 2 of one vessel and in 350 (18%) pairs the differences between vessels indicated that they were not sampled from artery and vein as intended. Only 60% of the cases with an arterial pH less than 7.05 had evidence of a metabolic acidosis (base deficit in the extracellular fluid 10 mmol/1 or more). Of all the cases, 2.5% had a venous‐arterial pH difference greater than 0.22 units. Conclusions Both artery and vein cord samples must be taken and the results screened to ensure separate vessels have been sampled. Interpretation of the results requires the examination of pCO 2 and base deficit of the extracellular fluid from each vessel as well as the pH. Confusion about the value of cord gas measurements may be due to the use of erroneous data and inadequate definitions of acidosis which do not differentiate between respiratory and metabolic components.