Premium
The surgical management of vaginal vault prolapse
Author(s) -
CREIGHTON SARAH M.,
STANTON STUART L.
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb15368.x
Subject(s) - medicine , surgery , hysterectomy , vaginal vault , cure rate , vaginal vault prolapse , uterine prolapse
Objective— A review of the results of surgery for vaginal vault prolapse following hysterectomy. Design— A retrospective review of all patients treated surgically for vaginal vault prolapse between 1981 and 1990 in one hospital. Setting— St George's Hospital, London. Subjects— 28 women. Interventions— The 28 patients underwent 33 operations, either a colposacropexy (23 procedures) or a Zacharin procedure (10 procedures). Of the 28 women 25 were seen in the gynaecological clinic within the last year. Main outcome measures— Pre‐ and post‐operative data and any interim prolapse surgery was recorded. Success of the procedure in terms of cure, urinary complications, infection and sexual function. Results— The mean follow‐up time was 17.1 months for the colposacropexy an 33 months for the Zacharin. The cure rate for colposacropexy was 91% and that for the Zacharin procedure was 70%. The two commonest complications were development of a voiding difficulty and infection. Three women developed voiding difficulty following the Zacharin and one following colposacropexy. Two women following colposacropexy required removal of the Mersilene mesh due to a persistent discharging sinus. Conclusion— The colposacropexy had a better success rate and, as it is a simpler operation to perform, has become the operation of choice in this unit. It is, however, associated with a risk of infection which can necessitate removal of the supporting mesh.