Premium
Is bladder catheterization really necessary before laparoscopy?
Author(s) -
AKHTAR M. S.,
BEERE D. M.,
WRIGHT J. T.,
MacRAE K. D.
Publication year - 1985
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1985.tb03033.x
Subject(s) - medicine , laparoscopy , randomized controlled trial , catheter , urinary catheterization , surgery , urinary system , urine , urinary bladder
Summary. A randomized prospective controlled trial compared a policy of bladder catheterization with no catheterization in patients undergoing laparoscopy. Of the 41 patients randomized to receive no catheterization, seven were actually catheterized on the judgment of the surgeon, but only one of them had <50 ml of urine. Midstream urine obtained 6 days after laparoscopy was infected in 9 (21%) of the 42 patients allocated to receive catheterization and in only five (12%) of those allocated to the no‐catheter group. Four of these five were actually not catheterized, giving an infection rate of 12% in the 34 patients not catheterized. The differences are statistically significant. A routine policy of catheterization for patients undergoing laparoscopy is questionable. All patients who are catheterized should be investigated for urinary tract infections after operation.