Premium
Midtrimester amniocentesis: is it safe? A single centre controlled prospective study of 517 consecutive amniocenteses
Author(s) -
SANTCASSIA L. J.,
MAcPHERSON MARION B. A.,
TYACK A. J.
Publication year - 1984
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1984.tb04842.x
Subject(s) - amniocentesis , medicine , obstetrics , pregnancy , gestational age , gynecology , prospective cohort study , gestation , significant difference , fetus , prenatal diagnosis , surgery , genetics , biology
Summary. The outcome of pregnancy following amniocentesis was studied prospectively in 517 consecutive patients undergoing amniocentesis in a single centre. The outcome in 289 of these pregnancies was compared with that in 289 control patients strictly matched for social class, age and parity. There were no significant differences in fetal loss, perinatal mortality or vaginal bleeding between the amniocentesis and control groups. There were significantly more congenital abnormalities in the amniocentesis group ( P <0.01). These appear to be associated with the amniocentesis procedure and not with the occurrence of raised maternal serum a‐fetoprotein levels. Although there was an increased risk of preterm delivery ( P <0.02) there was no significant difference in the distribution of birth weights by centiles for gestational age between amniocentesis and control groups. There was a significant association between intrauterine growth retardation and raised serum α‐fetoprotein ( P <0.005). It is concluded that where the indications are strong, amniocentesis continues to be justified.