z-logo
Premium
The acceptability of different types of soymilks available in Cape Town in consumers from high and low socio‐economic areas
Author(s) -
Hinze Astrid,
Karg Cheryl,
Van Zyl Maryke,
Mohamed Nazreen,
Steyn Nelia P.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
international journal of consumer studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.775
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 1470-6431
pISSN - 1470-6423
DOI - 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2004.00331.x
Subject(s) - taste , consumption (sociology) , significant difference , cape , population , age groups , psychology , geography , demography , medicine , environmental health , social science , sociology , archaeology , neuroscience
Abstract The aim of this study was to determine the knowledge and acceptability of soymilk (defined as consumption pattern/usage and taste) by adult consumers, residing in different socio‐economic areas (low vs. high) in Cape Town. The study population of 214 participants were selected using convenience sampling. A questionnaire was developed in order to obtain demographic data (four items); basic general knowledge of soymilk (four items); and acceptability of the tested products (consumption patterns and taste) (eight items). There was a significant difference between the two groups ( P  = 0.000) regarding basic knowledge of soymilk, with significantly more in the high socio‐economic area (HSEA) having a score of at least 75%. Gender ( P  = 0.082) and age ( P  = 0.122) did not have a significant impact on the consumption patterns of soymilk. There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to current usage ( P  = 0.228) and frequency of use ( P  = 0.213) of soymilk. However, a significantly smaller group ( P  = 0.000) of participants in the low socio‐economic area had previously tasted soymilk compared with those in the HSEA (16.7% vs. 41.5%; P  = 0.000). In conclusion, socio‐economic status appeared to be associated with knowledge of soymilk. No significant differences with regard to gender, age or current usage in the two groups studied were noted.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here