Premium
Experimenter Expectancy Effects in Frontal EMG Conditioning
Author(s) -
SegretoBures Joyce,
Kotses Harry
Publication year - 1982
Publication title -
psychophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.661
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1469-8986
pISSN - 0048-5772
DOI - 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1982.tb02508.x
Subject(s) - expectancy theory , psychology , conditioning , audiology , developmental psychology , reinforcement , relaxation (psychology) , cognitive psychology , social psychology , statistics , medicine , mathematics
Nonspecific factors such as placebo or expectancy effects may materially influence therapeutic outcome in EMG relaxation training. Yet, controlling for the expectations of experimenters has received little attention even though Rosenthal's Experimenter Expectancy Effect is well‐documented. This study examined the effects of experimenter expectancy on frontal EMG conditioning. During training, experimenters were given either no expectancy or led to believe that EMG conditioning would he either difficult (low expectancy) or easy (high expectancy) to achieve. Then, the three groups of experimenters collected data from subjects undergoing 20 min of either contingent or noncontingent reinforcement for frontal EMG decreases. Postexperimental credibility checks indicated that experimenters were unaware they were being studied but could identify their expectancy condition when informed of the three conditions. Differential EMG behavior was observed between groups conditioned by experimenters with no expectancies, with contingent subjects achieving significantly lower EMG levels than noncontingent subjects. Differences were not exhibited, however, between contingent and noncontingent subjects trained by experimenters with either low or high expectancies. These findings suggest that experimenters with prior expectations may covertly communicate to subjects response sets that interfere with acquisition of differential EMG behavior.