Premium
A Comparison of Auditory and Visual Feedback in Biofeedback Assisted Muscular Relaxation Training
Author(s) -
Alexander A. Barney,
French Cheryl Anne,
Goodman Naomi J.
Publication year - 1975
Publication title -
psychophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.661
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1469-8986
pISSN - 0048-5772
DOI - 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1975.tb01259.x
Subject(s) - biofeedback , psychology , auditory feedback , frontalis muscle , relaxation (psychology) , audiology , anxiety , visual feedback , facial electromyography , physical medicine and rehabilitation , session (web analytics) , electromyography , medicine , neuroscience , ophthalmology , ptosis , psychiatry , world wide web , computer science , computer vision
This study compared the efficacy of auditory and visual feedback in electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback assisted relaxation training of the frontalis muscle.Twenty‐eight subjects, divided into 4 groups matched on baseline frontalis EMG levels and trait anxiety, received 7 training sessions each under one of the following conditions: (1) auditory feedback‐eyes closed; (2) auditory feedback‐eyes open; (3) visual feedback; or (4) no feedback‐eyes closed. The group who received auditory feedback with the eyes closed manifested significant lowering of EMG over session compared to no significant reduction in EMG for the other three groups. EMG changes failed to correlate significantly with changes in self reports of subjective relaxation derived from pre‐to‐post session state anxiety test data. The possibility that the ineffectiveness of visual feedback in this study may be specific to the frontalis muscle was discussed and the need for further research in several areas was stressed.