z-logo
Premium
Analysis of the International Classification of Headache Disorders for diagnosis of migraine and tension‐type headache in children
Author(s) -
Rossi Livia N,
Vajani Stefania,
Cortinovis Ivan,
Spreafico Federica,
Menegazzo Lucia
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
developmental medicine and child neurology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.658
H-Index - 143
eISSN - 1469-8749
pISSN - 0012-1622
DOI - 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.02041.x
Subject(s) - international classification of headache disorders , aura , migraine , medicine , headaches , pediatrics , tension headache , primary headache , surgery
In 2004, the revised International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD‐II) was published. This study evaluates: (1) the results obtained from applying ICHD‐II to children with primary headaches to distinguish between migraine without aura (MO) and tension‐type headache (TTH); and (2) the results obtained from introducing modifications of the classification criteria for MO as suggested by various authors. There were 200 participants (93 males, 107 females; age range 3‐17y, mean 9y 8mo [SD 2y 7mo]). According to the ICHD‐II, MO compared with TTH was characterized by: higher intensity of pain; higher frequency of associated symptoms; and higher number of precipitating factors. The significant difference found between patients with MO/probable MO and those with TTH/probable TTH for the variables used in the ICHD‐II shows that these variables describe the two forms well. However, 15.5% of children proved to be unclassifiable, mainly because they could not give information for some criteria; other reasons for this were too short a duration of episodes and the possible overlap of criteria describing probable MO and probable TTH. The frequency of one variable, pulsating pain, significantly increased with age. Reduction of duration to 1 hour for MO produced a statistically non‐significant increase in the number of children with MO. Behaviour during attacks was found to be simple to apply in evaluating intensity and therefore was introduced as a new criterion. Severe intensity was related to MO, whereas moderate or low‐intensity was related to TTH.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here