z-logo
Premium
Trade‐offs between leaf hydraulic capacity and drought vulnerability: morpho‐anatomical bases, carbon costs and ecological consequences
Author(s) -
Nardini Andrea,
Pedà Giulia,
Rocca Nicoletta La
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
new phytologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.742
H-Index - 244
eISSN - 1469-8137
pISSN - 0028-646X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04294.x
Subject(s) - biology , specific leaf area , water transport , botany , habitat , agronomy , ecology , environmental science , photosynthesis , soil science , water flow
Summary Leaf hydraulic conductance ( K leaf ) and vulnerability constrain plant productivity, but no clear trade‐off between these fundamental functional traits has emerged in previous studies. We measured K leaf on a leaf area ( K leaf_area ) and mass basis ( K leaf_mass ) in six woody angiosperms, and compared these values with species’ distribution and leaf tolerance to dehydration in terms of P 50 , that is, the leaf water potential inducing 50% loss of K leaf . We also measured several morphological and anatomical traits associated with carbon investment in leaf construction and water transport efficiency. Clear relationships emerged between K leaf_mass , P 50 , and leaf mass per unit area ( LMA ), suggesting that increased tolerance to hydraulic dysfunction implies increased carbon costs for leaf construction and water use. Low P 50 values were associated with narrower and denser vein conduits, increased thickness of conduit walls, and increased vein density. This, in turn, was associated with reduced leaf surface area. Leaf P 50 was closely associated with plants’ distribution over a narrow geographical range, suggesting that this parameter contributes to shaping vegetation features. Our data also highlight the carbon costs likely to be associated with increased leaf tolerance to hydraulic dysfunction, which confers on some species the ability to thrive under reduced water availability but decreases their competitiveness in high‐resource habitats.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here