Premium
Divergence in an obligate mutualism is not explained by divergent climatic factors
Author(s) -
Godsoe William,
Strand Eva,
Smith Christopher Irwin,
Yoder Jeremy B.,
Esque Todd C.,
Pellmyr Olle
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
new phytologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.742
H-Index - 244
eISSN - 1469-8137
pISSN - 0028-646X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02942.x
Subject(s) - mutualism (biology) , obligate , coevolution , pollinator , biology , ecology , abiotic component , pollination , divergence (linguistics) , adaptation (eye) , nectar , habitat , evolutionary biology , pollen , linguistics , neuroscience , philosophy
Summary• Adaptation to divergent environments creates and maintains biological diversity, but we know little about the importance of different agents of ecological divergence. Coevolution in obligate mutualisms has been hypothesized to drive divergence, but this contention has rarely been tested against alternative ecological explanations. Here, we use a well‐established example of coevolution in an obligate pollination mutualism, Yucca brevifolia and its two pollinating yucca moths, to test the hypothesis that divergence in this system is the result of mutualists adapting to different abiotic environments as opposed to coevolution between mutualists. • We used a combination of principal component analyses and ecological niche modeling to determine whether varieties of Y. brevifolia associated with different pollinators specialize on different environments. • Yucca brevifolia occupies a diverse range of climates. When the two varieties can disperse to similar environments, they occupy similar habitats. • This suggests that the two varieties have not specialized on distinct habitats. In turn, this suggests that nonclimatic factors, such as the biotic interaction between Y. brevifolia and its pollinators, are responsible for evolutionary divergence in this system.