z-logo
Premium
Short‐term dynamics of abiotic and biotic soil  13 CO 2 effluxes after in situ   13 CO 2 pulse labelling of a boreal pine forest
Author(s) -
Subke JensArne,
Vallack Harry W.,
Magnusson Tord,
Keel Sonja G.,
Metcalfe Daniel B.,
Högberg Peter,
Ineson Phil
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
new phytologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.742
H-Index - 244
eISSN - 1469-8137
pISSN - 0028-646X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02883.x
Subject(s) - abiotic component , tracer , autotroph , flux (metallurgy) , environmental science , environmental chemistry , soil water , biotic component , atmospheric sciences , chemistry , soil science , ecology , biology , physics , nuclear physics , genetics , organic chemistry , bacteria
Summary•  Physical diffusion of isotopic tracers into and out of soil pores causes considerable uncertainty for the timing and magnitude of plant belowground allocation in pulse‐labelling experiments. •  Here, we partitioned soil CO 2 isotopic fluxes into abiotic tracer flux (physical return), heterotrophic flux, and autotrophic flux contributions following  13 CO 2 labelling of a Swedish Pinus sylvestris forest. Soil CO 2 efflux and its isotopic composition from a combination of deep and surface soil collars was monitored using a field‐deployed mass spectrometer. Additionally,  13 CO 2 within the soil profile was monitored. •  Physical (abiotic) efflux of  13 CO 2 from soil pore spaces was found to be significant for up to 48 h after pulse labelling, and equalled the amount of biotic label flux over 6 d. Measured and modelled changes in  13 CO 2 concentration throughout the soil profile corroborated these results. Tracer return via soil CO 2 efflux correlated significantly with the proximity of collars to trees, while daily amplitudes of total flux (including heterotrophic and autotrophic sources) showed surprising time shifts compared with heterotrophic fluxes. •  The results show for the first time the significance of the confounding influence of physical isotopic CO 2 ‐tracer return from the soil matrix, calling for the inclusion of meaningful control treatments in future pulse‐chase experiments.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here