z-logo
Premium
Hierarchical statistical modeling of xylem vulnerability to cavitation
Author(s) -
Ogle Kiona,
Barber Jarrett J.,
Willson Cynthia,
Thompson Brenda
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
new phytologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.742
H-Index - 244
eISSN - 1469-8137
pISSN - 0028-646X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02760.x
Subject(s) - xylem , cavitation , hydraulic conductivity , bayesian probability , weibull distribution , exponential function , vulnerability (computing) , function (biology) , statistics , sigmoid function , biological system , soil science , sensitivity (control systems) , environmental science , mathematics , econometrics , computer science , biology , mechanics , physics , botany , mathematical analysis , soil water , engineering , artificial intelligence , computer security , evolutionary biology , electronic engineering , artificial neural network
Summary•  Cavitation of xylem elements diminishes the water transport capacity of plants, and quantifying xylem vulnerability to cavitation is important to understanding plant function. Current approaches to analyzing hydraulic conductivity ( K ) data to infer vulnerability to cavitation suffer from problems such as the use of potentially unrealistic vulnerability curves, difficulty interpreting parameters in these curves, a statistical framework that ignores sampling design, and an overly simplistic view of uncertainty. •  This study illustrates how two common curves (exponential‐sigmoid and Weibull) can be reparameterized in terms of meaningful parameters: maximum conductivity ( k sat ), water potential (– P ) at which percentage loss of conductivity (PLC) = X % ( P X ), and the slope of the PLC curve at P X ( S X ), a ‘sensitivity’ index. •  We provide a hierarchical Bayesian method for fitting the reparameterized curves to K H data. We illustrate the method using data for roots and stems of two populations of Juniperus scopulorum and test for differences in k sat , P X , and S X between different groups. •  Two important results emerge from this study. First, the Weibull model is preferred because it produces biologically realistic estimates of PLC near P  = 0 MPa. Second, stochastic embolisms contribute an important source of uncertainty that should be included in such analyses.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here