Premium
Conflict, cheats and the persistence of symbioses
Author(s) -
Douglas Angela E.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
new phytologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.742
H-Index - 244
eISSN - 1469-8137
pISSN - 0028-646X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02326.x
Subject(s) - cheating , symbiosis , biology , mutualism (biology) , ecology , coevolution , obligate , parasitism , evolutionary biology , host (biology) , genetics , bacteria
Summary Many symbioses are widespread, abundant, and evolutionarily persistent. This is despite unambiguous evidence for conflict between the partners and the existence of cheats that use benefits derived from their partners while providing reduced or no services in return. Evidence from a diversity of associations suggests that symbioses are robust to cheating in several ways. Some symbioses persist despite conflict and cheating because of the selective advantage of cost‐free interactions (also known as byproduct mutualistic interactions), which incur no conflict. There is also evidence for the suppression of cheating by sanctions imposed by partners in some symbioses, and vertical transmission has been shown experimentally to promote traits that enhance partner performance. It is argued that these processes contribute to the apparent rarity of evolutionary transitions from symbiosis to parasitism. There is strong phylogenetic evidence for the evolutionary reversion of various symbiotic organisms to free‐living lifestyles, but at least some of these transitions can be attributed to selection pressures other than within‐symbiosis conflict. The principal conclusion is that, although conflict is common in symbioses, it is generally managed and contained.ContentsSummary 849 I. Introduction 850 II. Conflict and cheats 850 III. Symbiotic interactions without cost 852 IV. Routes to conflict resolution 854 V. Discussion 856Acknowledgements 857References 857