Premium
Foliar uptake and release of inorganic nitrogen compounds in Pinus sylvestris L. and Picea abies (L.) Karst.
Author(s) -
WILSON E.J.
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
new phytologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.742
H-Index - 244
eISSN - 1469-8137
pISSN - 0028-646X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01081.x
Subject(s) - picea abies , scots pine , shoot , canopy , botany , nitrogen , karst , chemistry , inorganic ions , ammonium , tree canopy , nutrient , horticulture , pinus <genus> , environmental chemistry , biology , ion , paleontology , organic chemistry
summary Foliar uptake and release of inorganic nitrogen compounds were studied by immersing current‐year shoots of Scots pine ( Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce [ Pica abies (L.) Karst] in either NH 4 + ‐ or NO 3 − ‐rain solutions at different N concentrations. The effects of N form, N concentration and tree species on ion influx and efflux were investigated. Spruce shoots absorbed NH 4 + from the external solution. Uptake apparently occurred by diffusion rather than by H + or base cation exchange as commonly accepted, and increased linearly with NH 4 + concentration in the external solution. In contrast, pine shoots released NH 4 + to the external solution. The different reactions of spruce and pine may reflect species differences in physical and chemical properties or differences in tissue N concentration. If the latter is the case, a tree's N status may determine whether the canopy acts as a source or sink for NH 4 + influencing deposition rates to the needle surface. The results show that where NH 4 + concentration on the needle surface exceeds 4 mg 1 −1 , foliar uptake may make a significant contribution to N status. In the absence of NH 4 + ‐base cation exchange, atmospheric inputs of NH 4 + to the canopy appear unlikely to be directly‐responsible for the nutrient deficiencies typical of Dutch forest decline. Neither spruce or pine shoots were able to utilize NO 3 − in the external solution and generally released NO 3 − . Adverse effects resulting from foliar accumulation of wet‐deposited NO 3 − appear unlikely. However, higher NO 3 − concentrations and longer residence times than simulated in this experiment may result in foliar uptake of NO 3 − in the field.