Premium
THE INFLUENCE OF VESICULAR‐ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZA ON GROWTH AND WATER RELATIONS OF RED CLOVER
Author(s) -
HARDIE KAY,
LEYTON L.
Publication year - 1981
Publication title -
new phytologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.742
H-Index - 244
eISSN - 1469-8137
pISSN - 0028-646X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1981.tb02339.x
Subject(s) - transpiration , shoot , mycorrhiza , biology , turgor pressure , soil water , arbuscular mycorrhiza , agronomy , water potential , root system , horticulture , botany , photosynthesis , symbiosis , ecology , genetics , bacteria
S ummary Vesicular‐arbuscular (VA) mycorrhizal infection of red clover grown in phosphate deficient soils enhanced the concentration of P in the tissues, stimulated growth of root and shoot but reduced the root/shoot ratio. Addition of phosphate to well below the optimum level also stimulated growth and enhanced P status of non‐mycorrhizal plants, but their yields and P concentrations were much smaller than those of mycorrhizal plants and their root/shoot ratios were unaffected. The hydraulic conductivities of the root systems were very much higher in mycorrhizal than in uninfected plants. This could be partly attributed to the greater lengths and diameters and hence total surface areas of the mycorrhizal roots. Per unit length of root, the conductivities of the mycorrhizal roots were still two to three times higher, suggesting that this was mainly due to hyphal growth in the soil. When soil water was not limiting, the lower root resistances combined with larger leaf surface areas and possibly also lower leaf diffusion resistances resulted in very much higher transpiration rates and fluxes in mycorrhizal than in non‐mycorrhizal plants. Under conditions of water stress, however, the leaf diffusion resistances of mycorrhizal plants were higher and transpiration fluxes lower compared with uninfected plants but, because of their higher total water demands, they wilted more rapidly. Mycorrhizal plants were able to extract soil moisture down to lower water potentials than non‐mycorrhizal plants (difference about 1 MPa) but, possibly because of their lower leaf water potentials and higher root conductivities, they recovered turgor more rapidly than non‐mycorrhizal plants when soil water was restored. Thus, the mycorrhizal habit is an advantage to the host plant in times of moisture stress.