z-logo
Premium
Nationalism chez G ellner
Author(s) -
Meadwell Hudson
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
nations and nationalism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.655
H-Index - 44
eISSN - 1469-8129
pISSN - 1354-5078
DOI - 10.1111/j.1469-8129.2012.00544.x
Subject(s) - proposition , nationalism , argument (complex analysis) , epistemology , relevance (law) , dimension (graph theory) , sociology , industrial society , philosophy , law , political science , anthropology , politics , medicine , mathematics , pure mathematics
The central distinguishing feature of E rnest G ellner's most important treatment of nationalism is the proposition that nationalism is necessary for industrial society. Relatively little attention has been paid to the philosophical dimension of this proposition. The question of necessity in social explanation, however, is a complicated philosophical problem and must be dealt with directly if this proposition is to be endorsed. I argue that G ellner's argument is philosophically flawed. The ‘ordinary prose’ of N ations and N ationalism fails to deliver what G ellner claims to have delivered: the demonstration of a necessary connection between nationalism and industrial society. This result is of particular relevance given G ellner's philosophical interests.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here