Premium
Who is entitled to ‘earn sovereignty'? Legitimacy and regime support in A bkhazia and N agorno‐ K arabakh
Author(s) -
Berg Eiki,
Mölder Martin
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
nations and nationalism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.655
H-Index - 44
eISSN - 1469-8129
pISSN - 1354-5078
DOI - 10.1111/j.1469-8129.2011.00527.x
Subject(s) - sovereignty , legitimacy , de facto , politics , democracy , state (computer science) , power (physics) , political science , democratic legitimacy , political economy , law , space (punctuation) , sociology , law and economics , linguistics , philosophy , physics , algorithm , quantum mechanics , computer science
A bkhazia and N agorno‐ K arabakh are internationally unrecognised political entities, or so‐called de facto states, that have emerged as a result of the incomplete and contested state‐formation of their parent states and of the secessionist movements that emerged in the power vacuum of the post‐ S oviet space. In addition to examining the conventional reliance on the self‐determination principle, usually followed by a call for international recognition (as often practised by emerging sovereigns), this article aims to survey whether these political entities have proved that they embody ‘rightful authority’ as such and whether they ‘have earned their sovereignty’. In other words, it attempts to examine the self‐determination claims in A bkhazia and N agorno‐ K arabakh based on legitimacy criteria that are widely accepted for liberal democratic societies using an analysis of the respective issues as they were represented in focus‐group discussions in these two regions.