Premium
Security threats, linguistic homogeneity, and the necessary conditions for political unification
Author(s) -
GRIFFITHS RYAN D.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
nations and nationalism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.655
H-Index - 44
eISSN - 1469-8129
pISSN - 1354-5078
DOI - 10.1111/j.1469-8129.2010.00429.x
Subject(s) - unification , politics , proposition , sovereignty , argument (complex analysis) , homogeneity (statistics) , linguistics , sociology , political economy , law and economics , political science , law , computer science , philosophy , biochemistry , chemistry , machine learning , programming language
. The proposition that security threats can drive states to pool their sovereignty has been around for some time. The existence of these threats, according to William Riker, is a necessary condition for political unification. A less common argument centers on linguistic homogeneity; it asserts that states must be sufficiently similar and speak the same language before they can successfully imagine a common state. This paper tests both hypotheses in a large‐ N analysis that identifies all instances of voluntary political unification between 1816 and 2001. It takes the form of a falsification probe and examines whether any unification happened in the absence of either an external security threat or a common language. It finds that political unification has occurred in relatively tranquil settings, but that all unifying dyads have shared a common language. Security threats are not a necessary condition, but a common language may well be.