Premium
Differential effects of catecholamines on vascular rings from ductus venosus and intrahepatic veins of fetal sheep
Author(s) -
Tchirikov Mikhail,
Kertschanska Sonja,
Schröder Hobe J.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
the journal of physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.802
H-Index - 240
eISSN - 1469-7793
pISSN - 0022-3751
DOI - 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2003.00519.x
Subject(s) - ductus venosus , fetus , medicine , cardiology , differential (mechanical device) , hepatic veins , anatomy , chemistry , portal vein , biology , pregnancy , physics , genetics , thermodynamics
Ductus venosus (DV) sparing means the maintenance of blood flow through the DV following reduction of liver venous blood supply during fetal hypoxia. The present study compared the reactions of the isthmic portion of the DV and intrahepatic veins (IHVs) to catecholamines in vitro . Vessel rings of 1 mm width and 3 mm diameter were obtained from 17 fetal sheep (88–136 days gestational age, median 120 days). The immunohistochemical examination of the DV and IHV was performed in eight cases using an antibody against α‐smooth muscle actin and an antibody against α‐adrenergic receptors. Five vessel rings of the DV in early gestation (median 95 days) did not respond to KCl‐induced depolarisation. Force development in response to KCl of both vessel types increased with gestational age ( P < 0.05). The IHV required 4.1 ± 0.8 min (mean ± s.e.m. ) and the DV 14.5 ± 4.0 min to reach the maximum tension in response to KCl, which was 5.0 ± 4.0 mN in the IHV and 2.2 ± 1.9 mN in the DV ( n = 12, P < 0.05). The maximum forces developed in response to noradrenaline (norepinephrine; 42 μ m , n = 9) and adrenaline (epinephrine; 100 μ m , n = 12) were about sixfold higher in the IHV rings than in the DV rings ( P < 0.05). The EC 50 values of the DV and the IHV rings to noradrenaline were 5.9 ± 1.3 μ m and 5.0 ± 1.3 μ m , respectively ( P = 0.03). The EC 50 values of the adrenaline responses were 2.5 ± 0.5 μ m for the DV and 2.2 ± 0.7 μ m for the IHV (not significant). The α‐adrenergic receptors were present in the well‐structured media of IHVs, but were less distinctive in the wall of the DV. DV sparing can be attributed to an increased resistance of IHVs to catecholamines compared with the DV. The different responses can be explained by different anatomical and functional properties of the two vessel types.