z-logo
Premium
L‐type Ca 2+ current as the predominant pathway of Ca 2+ entry during I Na activation in β‐stimulated cardiac myocytes
Author(s) -
DelPrincipe Franco,
Egger Marcel,
Niggli Ernst
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
the journal of physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.802
H-Index - 240
eISSN - 1469-7793
pISSN - 0022-3751
DOI - 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00455.x
Subject(s) - thapsigargin , chemistry , biophysics , patch clamp , ryanodine receptor , isoprenaline , myocyte , stimulation , intracellular , endoplasmic reticulum , pipette , voltage clamp , membrane potential , analytical chemistry (journal) , endocrinology , biochemistry , biology , receptor , chromatography
1 In the present study Ca 2+ entry via different voltage‐dependent membrane channels was examined with a fluorescent Ca 2+ indicator before and after β‐adrenergic stimulation. 2 To clearly distinguish between Ca 2+ influx and Ca 2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum the Ca 2+ store was blocked with 0.1 μ m thapsigargin and 10 μ m ryanodine. Omitting Na + from the pipette filling solution minimized Ca 2+ entry via Na + ‐Ca 2+ exchange. 3 Individual guinea‐pig ventricular myocytes were voltage clamped in the whole‐cell configuration of the patch‐clamp technique and different membrane currents were activated using specific voltage protocols. The intracellular Ca 2+ concentration was simultaneously recorded with a laser‐scanning confocal microscope using fluo‐3 as a Ca 2+ indicator. 4 Ca 2+ entry pathways were discriminated using pharmacological blockers under control conditions and during β‐adrenergic stimulation with 1 μ m isoproterenol (isoprenaline) in the bathing solution or 100 μ m cAMP in the patch‐clamp pipette. 5 Isoproterenol or cAMP potentiated the Ca 2+ influx signals recorded during L‐type Ca 2+ current activation but, more interestingly, also during Na + current ( I Na ) activation. The Ca 2+ influx signal arising from L‐type Ca 2+ current activation was usually blocked by 50 μ m Cd 2+ . However, the Ca 2+ influx signal elicited by the Na + current activation protocol was only curtailed to 56.4 ± 28.2 % by 100 μ m Ni 2+ but was reduced to 17.9 ± 15.1 % by 50 μ m Cd 2+ and consistently eliminated by 5 m m Ni 2+ . 6 The pronounced Cd 2+ and moderate Ni 2+ sensitivity of the Ca 2+ influx signals suggested that the predominant source of Ca 2+ influx during the Na + current activation – before and during β‐adrenergic stimulation – was a spurious activation of the L‐type Ca 2+ current, presumably due to voltage escape during Na + current activation. 7 Calculations based on the relationship between Ca 2+ current and fluorescence change revealed that, on average, we could reliably detect rapid Ca 2+ concentration changes as small as 5.4 ± 0.7 n m . Thus, we can estimate an upper limit for the Ca 2+ permeability of the phosphorylated TTX‐sensitive Na + channels which is less than 0.04:1 for Ca 2+ ions flowing through Na + channels via the proposed ‘slip‐mode’ Ca 2+ conductance. Therefore the slip‐mode Ca 2+ conductance of Na + channels does not contribute noticeably to the Ca 2+ signals observed in our experiments.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom