Premium
Receptor targeting and heterogeneity at interneuronal nicotinic cholinergic synapses in vivo
Author(s) -
Temburni Murali Krishna,
Blitzblau Rachel C.,
Jacob Michele H.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
the journal of physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.802
H-Index - 240
eISSN - 1469-7793
pISSN - 0022-3751
DOI - 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00021.x
Subject(s) - neuroscience , postsynaptic potential , neurotransmitter receptor , nicotinic agonist , biology , cholinergic , nicotinic acetylcholine receptor , acetylcholine receptor , glycine receptor , receptor , glycine , biochemistry , amino acid
Within a single neuron the correct targeting of the diverse neurotransmitter receptor types to discrete synaptic regions is crucial for proper function. However, the molecular mechanisms that underlie neuronal receptor clustering and targeting are still largely undefined. Here we report advances in defining the mechanisms that mediate nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) targeting to interneuronal synapses. Recent in vivo studies have demonstrated that one subunit plays a critical role in the differentiation of nicotinic cholinergic synapses on vertebrate autonomic neurons. The major cytoplasmic loop of the α3 subunit targets specific nAChR subtypes to the synapse. In contrast, nAChR complexes that lack the α3 targeting domain are excluded and are perisynaptic. Additional studies have demonstrated a greater complexity to α3‐nAChR targeting due to a unique postsynaptic receptor microheterogeneity – under one presynaptic terminal, α3‐nAChR clusters are separate, but proximal to, glycine receptor (GlyR) clusters in discrete postsynaptic membrane microregions. The surprising coexistence under one nerve ending of separate clusters of receptors that respond to different fast‐acting transmitters with opposing functions may represent a novel mechanism for modulating synaptic activity. Overall, the receptor targeting and clustering studies reviewed in this issue suggest that a common mechanism underlies the formation of the diverse types of interneuronal synapses but differs from that responsible for neuromuscular junction assembly in vertebrates.