Premium
The rostral ventrolateral medulla mediates the sympathoactivation produced by chemical stimulation of the rat nasal mucosa
Author(s) -
McCulloch Paul F.,
Panneton W. Michael,
Guyenet Patrice G.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
the journal of physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.802
H-Index - 240
eISSN - 1469-7793
pISSN - 0022-3751
DOI - 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0471v.x
Subject(s) - rostral ventrolateral medulla , stimulation , mucous membrane of nose , baroreflex , brainstem , medicine , medulla oblongata , medulla , baroreceptor , chemistry , phrenic nerve , endocrinology , anesthesia , heart rate , respiratory system , anatomy , blood pressure , central nervous system
1 We sought to outline the brainstem circuit responsible for the increase in sympathetic tone caused by chemical stimulation of the nasal passages with ammonia vapour. Experiments were performed in α‐chloralose‐anaesthetized, paralysed and artificially ventilated rats. 2 Stimulation of the nasal mucosa increased splanchnic sympathetic nerve discharge (SND), elevated arterial blood pressure (ABP), raised heart rate slightly and inhibited phrenic nerve discharge. 3 Bilateral injections of the broad‐spectrum excitatory amino acid receptor antagonist kynurenate (Kyn) into the rostral part of the ventrolateral medulla (RVLM; rostral C1 area) greatly reduced the effects of nasal mucosa stimulation on SND (‐80 %). These injections had no effect on resting ABP, resting SND or the sympathetic baroreflex. 4 Bilateral injections of Kyn into the ventrolateral medulla at the level of the obex (caudal C1 area) or into the nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS) greatly attenuated the baroreflex and significantly increased the baseline levels of both SND and ABP. However they did not reduce the effect of nasal mucosa stimulation on SND. 5 Single‐unit recordings were made from 39 putative sympathoexcitatory neurons within the rostral C1 area. Most neurons (24 of 39) were activated by nasal mucosa stimulation (+65·8 % rise in discharge rate). Responding neurons had a wide range of conduction velocities and included slow‐conducting neurons identified previously as C1 cells. The remaining putative sympathoexcitatory neurons were either unaffected ( n = 8 neurons) or inhibited ( n = 7 ) during nasal stimulation. We also recorded from ten respiratory‐related neurons, all of which were silenced by nasal stimulation. 6 In conclusion, the sympathoexcitatory response to nasal stimulation is largely due to activation of bulbospinal presympathetic neurons within the RVLM. We suggest that these neurons receive convergent and directionally opposite polysynaptic inputs from arterial baroreceptors and trigeminal afferents. These inputs are integrated within the rostral C1 area as opposed to the NTS or the caudal C1 area.