Premium
Levels of organization in biology: on the nature and nomenclature of ecology’s fourth level
Author(s) -
Lidicker William Z.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
biological reviews
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.993
H-Index - 165
eISSN - 1469-185X
pISSN - 1464-7931
DOI - 10.1111/j.1469-185x.2007.00032.x
Subject(s) - ecology , hierarchy , term (time) , temporal scales , landscape ecology , scale (ratio) , biology , geography , environmental resource management , habitat , environmental science , physics , cartography , quantum mechanics , economics , market economy
Viewing the universe as being composed of hierarchically arranged systems is widely accepted as a useful model of reality. In ecology, three levels of organization are generally recognized: organisms, populations, and communities (biocoenoses). For half a century increasing numbers of ecologists have concluded that recognition of a fourth level would facilitate increased understanding of ecological phenomena. Sometimes the word “ecosystem” is used for this level, but this is arguably inappropriate. Since 1986, I and others have argued that the term “landscape” would be a suitable term for a level of organization defined as an ecological system containing more than one community type. However, “landscape” and “landscape level” continue to be used extensively by ecologists in the popular sense of a large expanse of space. I therefore now propose that the term “ecoscape” be used instead for this fourth level of organization. A clearly defined fourth level for ecology would focus attention on the emergent properties of this level, and maintain the spatial and temporal scale‐free nature inherent in this hierarchy of organizational levels for living entities.