z-logo
Premium
New Parliament, New Cleavages after the Eastern Enlargement? The Conflict over the Services Directive as an Opposition between the Liberals and the Regulators
Author(s) -
CRESPY AMANDINE,
GAJEWSKA KATARZYNA
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
jcms: journal of common market studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.54
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1468-5965
pISSN - 0021-9886
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02109.x
Subject(s) - parliament , opposition (politics) , directive , resizing , political science , politics , cleavage (geology) , political economy , negotiation , law , law and economics , sociology , european union , international trade , economics , engineering , geotechnical engineering , fracture (geology) , computer science , programming language
This article analyses the parliamentary debates and decision‐making related to the highly contentious EU directive on services. It is intended as a contribution to the academic debate on political conflict lines in the European Parliament. Our argument is that neither the left–right cleavage nor a territorial one (old versus new Member States) can fully explain conflict at stake on socio‐economic issues. Rather, what we can observe is cross‐cutting opposition between ‘regulators’ and ‘liberals’.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here