z-logo
Premium
An Empirical Investigation of the True and Fair Override in the United Kingdom
Author(s) -
Livne Gilad,
McNichols Maureen
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of business finance and accounting
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.282
H-Index - 77
eISSN - 1468-5957
pISSN - 0306-686X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2008.02112.x
Subject(s) - equity (law) , accounting , earnings , earnings management , earnings quality , quality (philosophy) , business , economics , corporation , actuarial science , accrual , finance , law , political science , philosophy , epistemology
Abstract:  The True and Fair View concept requires companies to depart from GAAP or the law if necessary to present a true and fair view of the corporation's financial affairs. We analyze UK public companies invoking a true and fair override to assess whether overrides are associated with weakened performance, earnings quality and informativeness. We find quantified overrides increase income and equity significantly, and firms that invoke more costly overrides report weaker performance. We also find that firms invoking the most costly overrides have less informative financial statements than control firms, and lower earnings quality. In contrast, firms invoking less costly overrides do not exhibit weaker performance, less informative financial statements or weaker earnings quality. These findings are relevant for the debate on principle‐ vs. rules‐based accounting.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here