z-logo
Premium
From Habituality to Change: Contribution of Activity Theory and Pragmatism to Practice Theories
Author(s) -
MIETTINEN REIJO,
PAAVOLA SAMI,
POHJOLA PASI
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal for the theory of social behaviour
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.615
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1468-5914
pISSN - 0021-8308
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2012.00495.x
Subject(s) - pragmatism , transformative learning , epistemology , phenomenology (philosophy) , sociology , embodied cognition , unconscious mind , agency (philosophy) , practice theory , philosophy , pedagogy
The new social theories of practice have been inspired by Wittgenstein's late philosophy, phenomenology and more recent sociological theories. They regard embodied skills and routinized, mostly unconscious habits as a key foundation of human practice and knowledge. This position leads to an overstatement of the significance of the habitual dimension of practice. As several critics have suggested this approach omits the problems of transformative agency and change of practices. In turn classical practice theories, activity theory and pragmatism have analyzed the mechanisms of change. Pragmatism suggests that a crisis of a habit calls for reflection. Through working hypotheses and experimentation this leads to a transformation of a practice. Activity theory introduced the concept of remediation. A collective elaboration of shared mediational artefacts is needed to transform an activity.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here