Premium
The Role of Social Cognition in the Religious Fundamentalism‐Prejudice Relationship
Author(s) -
Hill Eric D.,
Cohen Adam B.,
Terrell Heather K.,
Nagoshi Craig T.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal for the scientific study of religion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.941
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 1468-5906
pISSN - 0021-8294
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01542.x
Subject(s) - fundamentalism , prejudice (legal term) , psychology , social psychology , consistency (knowledge bases) , cognition , preference , racism , need for cognition , sociology , gender studies , law , political science , geometry , mathematics , neuroscience , politics , economics , microeconomics
The study examines the indirect effects of religious fundamentalism on prejudice through cognitive style and fear of invalidity. Undergraduates (n= 199) completed measures of religious fundamentalism, homophobia, modern racism, hostile and benevolent sexism, need for cognition, need for structure, preference for consistency, and fear of invalidity. Need for cognition partially mediated the relationship between religious fundamentalism and both homophobia and benevolent sexism. Preference for consistency partially mediated the relationship between religious fundamentalism and hostile sexism. The indirect effect of religious fundamentalism on modern racism through preference for consistency approached statistical significance. The interaction between need for structure and fear of invalidity partially mediated the relationship between religious fundamentalism and both homophobia and hostile sexism, with individuals high in need for structure and low in fear of invalidity having higher religious fundamentalism and prejudice.