z-logo
Premium
J. Cosmet. Sci.,   59 , 225–232 (May/June 2008) AFM capabilities in characterization of particles and surfaces: from angstroms to microns *
Author(s) -
Starosti.,
Brodsky M.,
Prikhodko S.,
Hoo C. M.,
Mecartney M. L.,
West P.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
international journal of cosmetic science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.532
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1468-2494
pISSN - 0142-5463
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-2494.2009.00462_4.x
Subject(s) - characterization (materials science) , particle (ecology) , dynamic light scattering , particle size , scanning electron microscope , transmission electron microscopy , atomic force microscopy , materials science , nanotechnology , microscopy , resolution (logic) , surface roughness , analytical chemistry (journal) , optics , chemistry , physics , nanoparticle , composite material , chromatography , oceanography , artificial intelligence , computer science , geology
Synopsis Scanning probe microscopy (SPM), invented 25 years ago, is now routinely employed as a surface characterization technique. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is the most widely used form of SPM, since AFM can be used in ambient conditions with minimal sample preparation. Examples of applications relevant to cosmetics include, but are not limited to, hair and skin roughness measurements and powder particle and nano‐emulsion characterization. AFM is well suited for individual particle characterization, especially for measurements of volume, height, size, shape, aspect ratio, and particle surface morphology. Statistical distributions for a large set of particles can be generated through single‐particle analysis techniques (i.e. ensemble‐like information). AFM is better capable of resolving complex particle‐size distributions than dynamic light‐scattering (DLS). Single‐particle analysis techniques with AFM can be more cost‐and time‐effective than analyses using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). However, AFM offers resolution that is comparable to or greater than SEM or transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and routinely allows direct measurements of the particle height and volume and produces images easily displayed in a quantified 3D format.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here