Premium
Development of Social Health Insurance in Mongolia: Successes, Challenges and Lessons
Author(s) -
Bayarsaikhan Dorjsuren,
Kwon Soonman,
Ron Aviva
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
international social security review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.349
H-Index - 28
eISSN - 1468-246X
pISSN - 0020-871X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-246x.2005.00224.x
Subject(s) - business , population , government (linguistics) , self insurance , health care , economic growth , risk pool , social determinants of health , social security , subsidy , health policy , key person insurance , finance , insurance policy , environmental health , economics , medicine , market economy , linguistics , philosophy
This paper examines the process of developing social health insurance in Mongolia, and its successes, challenges and lessons. The government of Mongolia introduced social health insurance in 1994, which is compulsory for all public and private sector employees and low‐income and vulnerable population groups. The scheme also provided voluntary insurance for unemployed people of working age. About 95 per cent of the population was covered by health insurance within the first two years thanks to a high level of government subsidy for vulnerable population groups. The insurance benefit initially covered nearly all inpatient services except the treatment of some specified chronic and infectious diseases, which were directly funded by the government. The scheme not only had many successes but also faced challenges in maintaining universal coverage. The new financing arrangement has provided little financial incentive for healthcare providers to contain health expenditure, contributing to rapid health cost inflation. In addition to reforming the payment system for providers, there has been an increasing need to expand benefits into ambulatory care. The development of compulsory health insurance in Mongolia shows that a prepaid health insurance mechanism based on risk sharing and fund pooling is feasible in low‐income countries given political commitment and government financial support for vulnerable population groups.