Premium
Market Price of Risk: A Comparison among the United States, United Kingdom, Australia and Japan *
Author(s) -
WANG KENT
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
international review of finance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.489
H-Index - 18
eISSN - 1468-2443
pISSN - 1369-412X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-2443.2009.01098.x
Subject(s) - economics , econometrics , market risk , financial economics , market neutral , risk premium , hedge , portfolio , capital asset pricing model , context (archaeology) , market portfolio , conditional variance , autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity , volatility (finance) , ecology , paleontology , biology
This study examines and compares the market price of risk of the S&P 500, FTSE 100, All Ordinaries, and Nikkei 225 markets from 1984 to 2009 in the framework of Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model (ICAPM). We follow the Vector Autoregressive instrumental variable approach in identifying the risk and hedge components of market returns and argue that in the context of market integration, covariance with a world market portfolio is a better measure of market risk than conditional market variance. Evidence is documented in support of using covariance as a risk measure in explaining market risk premiums in the Australian and Japanese markets. CAY, the consumption wealth ratio from the US market is found to be a robust state variable that helps to explain both conditional variance and covariance processes in the four markets. The market prices of risk, after controlling for the hedging demands, are positive and significant with the United States having the highest price of risk. The results are confirmed using a series of robustness tests that include varying the sampling interval.