z-logo
Premium
Decentralizing I ndonesian City Spaces as New ‘Centers’
Author(s) -
Miller Michelle Ann
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
international journal of urban and regional research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.456
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 1468-2427
pISSN - 0309-1317
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2013.01209.x
Subject(s) - decentralization , framing (construction) , democratization , authoritarianism , legislation , democracy , autonomy , indonesian , political science , public administration , state (computer science) , urban planning , sociology , geography , politics , law , engineering , linguistics , philosophy , archaeology , algorithm , computer science , civil engineering
Since the introduction of regional autonomy legislation in 1999, I ndonesia has embarked on the world's biggest experiment with democratic decentralization. The intertwined processes of democratization and decentralization have dismantled I ndonesia's centralized authoritarian system and reordered its governmental structures. These conjoined processes have set in motion conditions for the transformation of a number of I ndonesia's secondary cities into regional ‘centers’ through the influx of new peoples, funding and ways of interacting within localized contexts and with the outside world. In this article I consider I ndonesia's decentralization processes through the lens of the city, focusing on three key areas in the rising profile and development of urban centers. First, I look at the framing of Indonesian cities within contemporary urban discourses to highlight the array of urban spaces that coexist in the era of decentralization. Second, I describe how I ndonesia's decentralization laws have structurally privileged cities by bypassing the provincial level and devolving most state powers directly to sub‐provincial administrations. Third, I explore how Indonesian cities compete and cooperate over limited state resources under the decentralized system and why some cities have been able to reinvent themselves as new centers in planning, practice and innovation, and why others continue to lag behind.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here