z-logo
Premium
Knowledge Management in Strategic Alliances: A Review of Empirical Evidence
Author(s) -
Meier Matthias
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
international journal of management reviews
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.475
H-Index - 107
eISSN - 1468-2370
pISSN - 1460-8545
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00287.x
Subject(s) - knowledge management , empirical evidence , knowledge transfer , empirical research , organizational learning , body of knowledge , business , knowledge creation , order (exchange) , field (mathematics) , knowledge value chain , strategic management , personal knowledge management , computer science , marketing , epistemology , philosophy , mathematics , finance , pure mathematics , downstream (manufacturing)
Knowledge‐related and organizational learning processes in alliances have received much attention throughout the last 25 years. The field has generated a rapidly growing body of empirical evidence on how knowledge is managed in alliances. However, the sphere is highly complex, fragmented, incoherent, and heterogeneous in terms of the theoretical approaches applied. This paper presents an integrative and organizing framework for the empirical literature on knowledge management in strategic alliances. It illustrates how the knowledge management outcomes of knowledge creation, transfer and application are determined by four distinct sets of factors: knowledge characteristics, partner characteristics, partner interaction, and active knowledge management. Based on this framework, this review analyses and integrates empirical evidence in order to identify where findings converge and where results conflict. So far, research has focused strongly on singular interrelations between these four sets of factors and the transfer of knowledge. Conversely, the questions of how knowledge is created, retained, retrieved and applied and how the interplay of the different factors affects knowledge management in strategic alliances remain widely unexplored. The review concludes with a summary of the current state of the art in empirical research and discusses some promising avenues for future investigation.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here