Premium
Activism
Author(s) -
Greenspan Alan
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
international finance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.458
H-Index - 39
eISSN - 1468-2362
pISSN - 1367-0271
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-2362.2011.01277.x
Subject(s) - economics , shock (circulatory) , unemployment , monetary economics , asset (computer security) , stock market , government (linguistics) , investment (military) , cash flow , stock (firearms) , macroeconomics , finance , politics , political science , medicine , mechanical engineering , paleontology , linguistics , philosophy , computer security , horse , biology , computer science , law , engineering
The US recovery from the 2008 financial and economic crisis has been disappointingly tepid. What is most notable in sifting through the variables that might conceivably account for the lacklustre rebound in GDP growth and the persistence of high unemployment is the unusually low level of corporate illiquid long‐term fixed asset investment. As a share of corporate liquid cash flow, it is at its lowest level since 1940. This contrasts starkly with the robust recovery in the markets for liquid corporate securities. What, then, accounts for this exceptionally elevated level of illiquidity aversion? I break down the broad potential sources, and analyse them with standard regression techniques. I infer that a minimum of half and possibly as much as three‐fourths of the effect can be explained by the shock of vastly greater uncertainties embedded in the competitive, regulatory and financial environments faced by businesses since the collapse of Lehman Brothers, deriving from the surge in government activism. This explanation is buttressed by comparison with similar conundrums experienced during the 1930s. I conclude that the current government activism is hampering what should be a broad‐based robust economic recovery, driven in significant part by the positive wealth effect of a buoyant U.S. and global stock market.