Premium
The de‐collectivisation of pay setting in Britain 1990–98: incidence, determinants and impact
Author(s) -
Charlwood Andy
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
industrial relations journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.525
H-Index - 3
eISSN - 1468-2338
pISSN - 0019-8692
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-2338.2007.00434.x
Subject(s) - economics , collective bargaining , falling (accident) , labour economics , demise , productivity , unemployment , payment , inequality , wage , demographic economics , economic growth , political science , finance , medicine , mathematical analysis , mathematics , environmental health , law
What were the causes and consequences of declining collective bargaining coverage in Britain? The demise of collective bargaining did not lead to a greater use of individualised payment mechanisms, ‘high‐involvement’ practices or productivity gains. Wage inequality rose as a result of the decline. However, workplaces that abandoned bargaining created more jobs. Overall, these results raise questions about Britain’s labour market performance during the 1990s because they suggest that falling unemployment as a result of weaker trade unions came at the price of slower productivity growth and widening male wage inequality.