z-logo
Premium
The Determinants of Stock Option Compensation: Evidence from Finland
Author(s) -
JONES DEREK C.,
KALMI PANU,
MÄKINEN MIKKO
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
industrial relations: a journal of economy and society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.61
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1468-232X
pISSN - 0019-8676
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-232x.2006.00432.x
Subject(s) - stock options , incentive , stock (firearms) , restricted stock , non qualified stock option , business , panel data , stock market , enterprise value , economics , finance , econometrics , microeconomics , mechanical engineering , paleontology , horse , engineering , biology
A new, long, and rich panel data set consisting of all Finnish publicly traded firms is used to study how firm characteristics and stock market developments influence the adoption and targeting of stock option compensation. Stock option adoption is found to be a procyclical phenomenon. Findings from firm‐level econometric analysis often corroborate those based on U.S. data, but important differences also emerge. Findings include: (i) firms with higher market value per employee are more likely to use stock option compensation; (ii) share returns from the past year affect the adoption of targeted stock options, but not broad‐based plans; (iii) our results are consistent with the hypothesis that selective and broad‐based plans arise as solutions to differing monitoring difficulties. Broad‐based schemes are observed when production is human capital‐intensive and employee performance is hard to monitor, while selective schemes are adopted when ownership is dispersed and therefore owners may have weak incentives to monitor management.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here