z-logo
Premium
Interstate vs. Interprovincial Differences in Union Density
Author(s) -
MELTZ NOAH M.
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
industrial relations: a journal of economy and society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.61
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1468-232X
pISSN - 0019-8676
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-232x.1989.tb00862.x
Subject(s) - union density , legislation , public sector , collective bargaining , private sector , politics , distribution (mathematics) , work (physics) , state (computer science) , demographic economics , political science , labour economics , business , economics , law , mechanical engineering , mathematical analysis , mathematics , algorithm , computer science , engineering
Union density in Canada is approximately twice that in the United States. The range of densities from high to low states/provinces is much smaller, however: 2:1 in Canada vs. 6:1 in the U.S. After adjusting for differences in industry distribution of employment, this study finds that the major source of interstate and interprovincial differences is private sector density. Most of the low union density states have right‐to‐work laws, while the greater the comprehensiveness of state bargaining laws, the higher the public sector density. In Canada, where all public and private sector employees have the right to bargain, there is a higher average level of public and private sector densities and a smaller range for both. The more supportive labor legislation in Canada may be associated with the existence of labor‐oriented political parties at the provincial level.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here