Premium
The Scope of Conversion: Property and Contract
Author(s) -
Douglas Simon
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
the modern law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.37
H-Index - 22
eISSN - 1468-2230
pISSN - 0026-7961
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00850.x
Subject(s) - scope (computer science) , law and economics , tort , property rights , property (philosophy) , intellectual property , class (philosophy) , object (grammar) , business , law , reservation of rights , fundamental rights , political science , right to property , human rights , economics , liability , computer science , philosophy , epistemology , artificial intelligence , programming language
The article asks whether the tort of conversion should be expanded so as to protect contractual rights. The suggestion, found in recent case law and academic texts, that conversion should protect contractual rights because such rights belong to the law of property is rejected. It is argued that this approach is purely semantic and ignores the fact that contractual rights have different characteristics to other kinds of rights that we typically class as ‘property rights’. The better approach, it is argued, is to ask whether it is actually possible to protect contractual rights through the tort of conversion. The article attempts to show that the absence of certain features from contractual rights, in particular the fact that such rights do not relate to a physical object and are not exigible against the world, makes the expansion of conversion extremely difficult.