Premium
Reconstructing Insurance Law: The Law Commissions' Consultation Paper
Author(s) -
Merkin Rob,
Lowry John
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
the modern law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.37
H-Index - 22
eISSN - 1468-2230
pISSN - 0026-7961
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2008.00682.x
Subject(s) - principal (computer security) , warranty , insurance law , law , agency (philosophy) , commission , insurance policy , intermediary , business , bad faith , duty , commercial law , law reform , actuarial science , economics , law and economics , political science , general insurance , sociology , finance , social science , computer science , operating system
In July 2007 the English and Scottish Law Commissions published the consultation paper Insurance Law – Non‐disclosure and Breach of Warranty (hereafter LCCP) which sets out in detail the Commissions' provisional proposals for the reform of insurance contract law with particular reference to the key areas of utmost good faith, warranties and agency. This article analyses, from a critical standpoint, the LCCP's principal conclusions and recommendations. It begins by noting, as a means of demonstrating that the current reform process should be informed by modern industry practices, that the ways in which modern insurance contracts are concluded differ significantly from those when insurance law was last reviewed by the Law Commission in 1980. The article then discusses the dichotomy between consumer and business insurance given that this distinction underpins the LCCP and its approach towards reforming the pre‐contractual duty of good faith. By way of backdrop to the analysis, we consider the approach taken towards reforming the law governing intermediaries acting for prospective assureds during the disclosure process. Finally, the proposed rules for warranties and similar terms are examined. It is argued that the proposal to retain continuing warranties in business insurance contracts will, if implemented, represent a missed opportunity to rid insurance contracts of terms long criticised as draconian and disproportionate in their effect.