Premium
Apology and Retraction: Questioning Fundamentals: Leyland Daf and the “Ownership” of Charged Property
Author(s) -
Selvam Vijay S. V.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
the modern law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.37
H-Index - 22
eISSN - 1468-2230
pISSN - 0026-7961
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2004.00523.x
Subject(s) - fallacy , property (philosophy) , intellectual property , law , law and economics , business , political science , philosophy , sociology , epistemology
Forward Links to Citing Articles
Retraction . Modern Law Review 67: 5, 832‐843 .
Online publication date: 1‐Sept‐2004. The note entitled ‘Questioning Fundamentals: Leyland Daf and the “Ownership” of Charged Property’, 1 which appeared in the September issue of the Review has, through the sole fault of the author, failed to acknowledge the use of an article written by Dr Riz Mokal entitled ‘Liquidation Expenses and Floating Charges: The Separate Funds Fallacy’ 2 posted on the SSRN Electronic Library in April 2004. Any views that appear similar between these articles belong to Dr Mokal. It is sincerely hoped that Dr Mokal will accept this apology for the lapse in properly acknowledging his views.