z-logo
Premium
The mid‐M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery is a cutoff clot location for good outcome in intravenous thrombolysis
Author(s) -
Saarinen J. T.,
Sillanpää N.,
Rusanen H.,
Hakomäki J.,
Huhtala H.,
Lähteelä A.,
Dastidar P.,
Soimakallio S.,
Elovaara I.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
european journal of neurology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.881
H-Index - 124
eISSN - 1468-1331
pISSN - 1351-5101
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03689.x
Subject(s) - medicine , thrombolysis , modified rankin scale , middle cerebral artery , thrombus , internal carotid artery , cardiology , stroke (engine) , occlusion , thrombosis , computed tomography angiography , revascularization , angiography , radiology , surgery , ischemia , ischemic stroke , mechanical engineering , myocardial infarction , engineering
Background and purpose:  We studied the impact of the location of the thrombus (internal carotid artery, proximal M1 segment, distal M1 segment, M2 segment, and M3 segment of the middle cerebral artery) in predicting the clinical outcome of patients treated with intravenous thrombolytic therapy (<3 h) in a retrospective cohort. Methods:  Anterior circulation thrombus was detected with computed tomography angiography in 105 patients. Baseline clinical and radiological information was collected and entered into logistic regression analysis to predict favorable clinical outcome (3‐month modified Rankin Scale from 0 to 2 was a primary outcome measure). Results:  Three months after stroke, there was a significant increase in mortality (32% vs. 3%, P  <   0.001) and functional dependency (82% vs. 29%, P  <   0.001) in patients with internal carotid artery or proximal M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery thrombus compared to a more distal occlusion. In the regression analysis, after adjusting for National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, age, sex, and onset‐to‐treatment time, the clot location was an independent predictor of good clinical outcome ( P  =   0.001) and exhibited dose‐response type behavior when moving from a proximal vessel position to a more distal one. When the location was dichotomized, a cutoff between the proximal and the distal M1 segments best differentiated between good and poor clinical outcome (OR = 16.0, 95% CI 3.9–66.2). Conclusions:  The outcome of acute internal carotid artery or proximal M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery occlusion is generally poor even if treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Alternative revascularization strategies should be considered. Vascular imaging at the admission is required to guide this decision.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here