Premium
Diffusion‐weighted imaging findings differ between stroke attributable to spontaneous cervical artery dissection and patent foramen ovale
Author(s) -
Bonati L. H.,
Wetzel S. G.,
KesselSchaefer A.,
Buser P.,
Lyrer P. A.,
Engelter S. T.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
european journal of neurology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.881
H-Index - 124
eISSN - 1468-1331
pISSN - 1351-5101
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02805.x
Subject(s) - medicine , interquartile range , dissection (medical) , patent foramen ovale , stroke (engine) , cervical artery , vertebral artery dissection , carotid artery dissection , infarction , lesion , radiology , magnetic resonance imaging , diffusion mri , foramen , cardiology , surgery , myocardial infarction , mechanical engineering , percutaneous , engineering
Background and purpose: Spontaneous cervical arterial dissection and patent foramen ovale (PFO) are important causes of stroke in younger patients. We tested whether characteristics of cerebral ischaemia visible on diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) aid in differentiating between these two aetiologies. Methods: Diffusion‐weighted imaging was performed after a median of 2 days [interquartile range (IQR) 1–3 days] in 94 consecutive patients with an acute ischaemic stroke caused either by carotid or vertebral artery dissection ( n = 33) or PFO ( n = 61). We compared number, size, location and predefined patterns of DWI lesions between both aetiologies. Results: Ninety‐three out of 94 patients had acute DWI lesions and were included in the analysis. Multiple DWI lesions occurred more frequently in patients with dissection (23/33, 70%) than in those with PFO (26/60, 43%, P = 0.02). Lesions were larger in the dissection group [median diameter of largest lesion, 50 mm (IQR 19–68 mm)] than in the PFO group [23 (9–48) mm; P = 0.02]. The distribution of lesion patterns differed between the two aetiologies ( P < 0.001): single, non‐territorial infarcts were more frequent in PFO (25/60, 42%) than in dissection (2/33, 6%); large territorial infarcts with or without additional smaller lesions in the same territory occurred in 20/33 (61%) patients with dissection and in 16/60 (27%) patients with PFO. Conclusions: Diffusion‐weighted imaging characteristics differ between PFO and dissection, suggesting differences in the pathogenesis of brain infarction between these aetiologies. A single non‐territorial infarct seems to favour PFO as stroke aetiology. Whether this or other features are distinctive enough to diagnose PFO or dissection in individual patients requires further testing.